Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree?

Business is governed by so much variables that we can’t predict the future of any things: employer, product, consumer flow and business itself. Particularly, it is impossible to consider the fact of hiring the employer life long as business world is surmounted by full of uncertainties and complexities. Few reason listed below makes my point why I am particularly against the aroused topic.
Firstly, permanently hired employer may cause the less efficiency in the business. Since the people assured of their job for the life long, the other abstract thought may rise in their mindset: laziness. Sometimes employees have to fulfil their task because their job is on line. They have to do their specific task to please the boss, otherwise they might get loss it. While because of getting fixed job, they might not perform as like if they have demanding condition in their role. One lead to another, to make employers satisfied by granting them the permanent position may consequent the downfall of the business.
On the other hand, permanent position may halt the business plan and function. On growing technological innovation, business demands more innovate method to run the business in competitive market which old employers may failed to cope with as per plan. In this condition, problem will generate whether to keep the old employers despite their less use in the company or hire the new fresh blood to keep the company in the tract. Similarly, business dynamic nature may bring condition of downsizing the staff member; however, in this specific condition, an organization may go through the several loss as they have to pay staff fee even they are financially broke.
Every decision has its pro and cons; but, this proposal of the permanent job placement is practically impossible because of its unpredictability, innovative nature and multi variable governing factor. Since job prospect should model as per the time demand, it should be make flexible enough to make financially sound.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-06 quanjun 90 view
2022-09-05 neilyuan 76 view
2022-06-21 Rustin_Panda 86 view
2022-01-06 wally 76 view
2021-09-24 WatermelonUCLA 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user shrijan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
Business is governed by so much variables that we can’t predict the fut...
^^^^
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'Few reasons'.
Suggestion: Few reasons
...full of uncertainties and complexities. Few reason listed below makes my point why I am pa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun loss seems to be countable; consider using: 'several losses'.
Suggestion: several losses
...ion, an organization may go through the several loss as they have to pay staff fee even they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'made'?
Suggestion: made
...el as per the time demand, it should be make flexible enough to make financially sou...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, similarly, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78680576835 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603076923077 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6439944926 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170280702173 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057454534167 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406640008792 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915372411324 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346004007846 0.0645574589148 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.