Research shows that overeating can be just as harmful as smoking. Thus the advertising of certain food products should be banned, as cigarette is banned in many countries. Do you agree or disagree?
Overeating, the same as smoking, has a negative impact on people’s health, and therefore some people advocate that certain food advertising should be banned. While unhealthy diet habits are detrimental to people’s condition, I disagree that the government prohibits these food-related advertisement because there is no direct relation between overeating and food advertising.
It is undeniable that prohibition of some food products promotion can help tackle a few healthy problems such as obesity which is said to be a big threat among young generation. TV advertising gives foodies more opportunities to keep them posted with latest food products. This means people will tend to try new flavours and sometimes buy much more than they really need. As a result, they might get too much sugar and oil and get obesity. What’s more, the obesity will lead to other disease like heart attack. For example, forbidding Tim Tam biscuits that contain a great amount sugar are more likely to help solve these problems.
On the other hand, overeating does have damaging to people’s physical condition. However, there is no evidence to prove that these certain food-related advertising will give rise to overeating. People’s preference will not change just because of certain advertising. Even if the picture of cake looks really tasty, someone who dislikes sweets will not buy this cake. Also, every one has their own preferences on choosing what kind of snacks or cuisines. Whatever we eat is over certain amount will put a threat to our body condition, but it is impossible to ban all the food advertisement.
In conclusion, the prohibition of certain kind of food advertising can help solve some problems, but unhealthy diet habits are not developed by food products promotion. Thus it is unnecessary to ban the advertisement.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2014-11-18 | cloris_zheng | 73 | view |
- Environmental problems are so big that they cannot be solved by any person or country alone Instead it should be solved at international level To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 84
- It is better for students to live away from home than living with parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 86
- Today prison is the most common solution for crime. But some people think that it would be a more effective way to provide them with better education to prevent them from becoming criminals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- Someone think that robots are very important to humans’ future development, others thought that they are dangerous and have negative effects on society. Discuss both sides of view and give your own opinion. 68
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the Internet Discuss both views and give your own opi 78
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 293 350
No. of Characters: 1493 1500
No. of Different Words: 174 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.137 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.096 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.783 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 107 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.312 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.706 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.812 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.511 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.083 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5