The maps below show the sites of a school in 2013 and the planned one in 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps compare the original design of a school in 2013 with its proposed plan in 2016.
It is noticeable that the two initial buildings will remain their early positions with a new path connecting them. A new building will also be erected on the east side of the original ones. Therefore, the student population is expected to reach 1,000 pupils, compared to 600 in 2013.
In 2016, the playground will be moved to the south-east corner of the school since a new car park will replace it. Its oval shape is also proposed to turn into a rectangle. Finally, the plan intends to build a long road in the south that links the two parking spots.
Overall, two original buildings will have a short path to connect them as well as a third one will be also constructed; in addition, a long way will be made to link the initial and new parking spaces.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | khlytran | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | khlytran | 11 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | dann061006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-25 | Neeraja Meduri | 44 | view |
| 2021-12-09 | mnaufaln | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 78
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 78
- The diagrams below show the problem of flooding in a UK town and two possible solutions 89
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, so, therefore, third, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 694.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47741935484 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42819031804 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3467393354 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.75 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.082094657086 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045650613434 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663970232009 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769820204817 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800576084243 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.