Governments spend millions of dollars each year on their space programmes. Most recently, Mars is the focus of scientists' attention. Some people think this money would be better spent on dealing with problems closer to home. Do you agree or disagree?
Exploration to the outer space has been carried out numerous times since the first astronaunt set foot on the Moon. The economic sustainability over tremendous budget spending on this field, however, is controversial. The recent satellite launch to the Mars takes the debate to the next level. Some people believe that the amount of money being used in space programmes should be instead distributing to various domestic issues which I strongly disagree with. In this essay, I will list my reasons to why I am oppose to the idea.
To start with, the ratio of the budget spent on space research is so minimal that it can almost be neglected. According to NASA, the financial assistance they received from U.S government takes up a mere 0.04% amongst the other sections.People who perceive spacestudying as one gigantic cost to the nation wealth often fail to look at the whole picture which mislead them to the current conclusion. Millions of dollars might seems huge on paper, but it only consist of a tiny fraction in the fiscal budget.
Secondly, spaceship-manufacturing creates a vast job opportunity that benefit both individually and universally. With the need of the space-related market escalates, more labour and intelligence are required. Thus, it generates a wide range of works varying from intricate labourers to engineers and programmers. To put it short, the impact of space engineering is significance to shape a healthy economy.
Despite the two advantages mentioned above, space -studying also drives technology to outcompete with itself. To take an example, before a rocked is finally fired, it goes through hundreds of experiments simply to amplify the safety. What's more, each component has to go under a series of extremely stringent scrutinies to secure zero risks. As a consequence, a sequence of space-relate products emerge, showcasing their importance in our daily lives, such as GPS apps and satellites used to forcast weathers.
In summary, the finance allocated in space programmes is necessary. Human beings will benefit enormously from space projects in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-21 | Dyor | 71 | view |
| 2021-03-21 | Dyor | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-07 | Felicity Huang | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-11 | tuanhnguyen2611 | 74 | view |
| 2018-09-12 | duongthanhson | 95 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 511, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'opposed'.
Suggestion: opposed
...say, I will list my reasons to why I am oppose to the idea. To start with, the rati...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...nancial assistance they received from U.S government takes up a mere 0.04% amongs...
^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: People
...a mere 0.04% amongst the other sections.People who perceive spacestudying as one gigan...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists'?
Suggestion: consists
... might seems huge on paper, but it only consist of a tiny fraction in the fiscal budget...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shorts'?
Suggestion: shorts
...to engineers and programmers. To put it short, the impact of space engineering is sig...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...periments simply to amplify the safety. Whats more, each component has to go under a ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, in summary, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26409495549 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10794279839 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688427299703 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6970140942 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205485872527 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516895672393 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470830975821 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968010824379 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523220067424 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.