Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
Discussion controversial topics with those having contrasting views could be a messy situation as there is a likelihood of them rejecting your thought process. But to make that a premeditated notion should not become our second nature. Let's take a look at that.
While discussing a controversial view with someone of opposing view, there is a likely chance that you might discover some insights or facts that you might not have known of. A semi-transparent truth could turn out to be as harmful as a lie. Let's take the topic of electric cars now. Many people argue that these cars are great for environment due to their zero emmisions. But, these people does not bring into their view that the lead used to make batteries of these cars is almost as damaging to earth as that of burning of fossil feuls.
While having a discussion about a controversial topic with a person of different view, then and only then there is a likely chance of rebutting the entire thought process by explaining them the fallasy of their idea and thought process behind it. Our legal system of courts is prime example of it. Only with an arguement of defense and the prosecution and a rigorous example of rebuttal of evidence, hearing several testimonies and examining the opposing point of view can a verdict be reached. Otherwise, if the opposing stance is not corrected, then our judicial system would at been at an impasse right now.
And coming at the point of making final decision, by discussing, and only by discussing both sides of a controversial topic can a staunch decision can be made. Only by discussing these opposing views can we figure out the ideas that hold true so that the controversial view be converted to a decision. From a family deciding on where to go to a holiday and everyone have a different spot to the governing body that make decisions for the entire country, there is a need to have a discussion with someone having a controversial views in order to facilitate the decision making.
In all the above stated examples, there is a likelihood that discussion with someone over a controversial view can be really difficult, but only by means of discussing can we cool down the controversial view, just like a tea needs to be poured into the saucer to be cooled down. There is a likelihood that it might fall, but most likely the remaining tea will become cool after some time.
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 60
- Some people say history is one the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer 78
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet What are the causes of this problem How could it be solved 42
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supp 62
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...on should not become our second nature. Lets take a look at that. While discussin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...uld turn out to be as harmful as a lie. Lets take the topic of electric cars now. Ma...
^^^^
Line 7, column 505, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... need to have a discussion with someone having a controversial views in order to facil...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 528, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'view'?
Suggestion: view
...ion with someone having a controversial views in order to facilitate the decision mak...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, really, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74340527578 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76528645376 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47721822542 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.3216649438 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.352941176 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5294117647 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.70588235294 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273118132492 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805586146565 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736110466987 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159291442938 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311287250657 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.