Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In today's time, each and every one have some choice, whether it's a product such as a book or a service such as video streaming services online. And some people truly believe that nowadays, we have too many choices to select from. But in order to evaludate this arguement, we have to look at it from different persepective.
The variety of choice depends on the kind of product or service the user wants to avail. If a person wants to listen to a variety of music, they have various mediums to listen to such as radio, music TV channel and on various music streaming service online. Then, it can be said that the user does have a plethora of options to choose from. But when a user just wants to listen to a particular taste of music, such as classical music, these choices would then depend upon the availability of that music on each platform. As very few of the above services provides the user with classical music, these available choices vanishes in thin air and are reduced to only few option.
Also, the variety of choices are needed to be evaluated from another person's perspective as well. Consider a person who is earning a surplus amount of money and his doing well in life. Now, consider another person who is barely meeting ends in order to run his family. Both of them wants to buy an automobile for their convenience. If you look at it from first person's perspective, anyone could say that they have a surplus amount of choices while selecting the automobile of their choice. But, if you look at it from the second person's point of view, they would have a very tight budget for an automobile thereby reducing the choice for an automobile drastically.
In the end, I strongly disagree with the statement that some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices, because they have failed to take into account another person's perspective along with the type of product of service that person wants to avail.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum:"Because the future will be dominated by technology, we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students. If our s 63
- The charts below show each grade level s activity and the total revenue gained from it by percentage from King Primary School s recent fundraising event Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 82
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 66
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017 which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write a
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017 which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: EACH_AND_EVERY[1]
Message: Consider using 'each one'.
Suggestion: each one
In todays time, each and every one have some choice, whether its a product...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...and every one have some choice, whether its a product such as a book or a service s...
^^^
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun option seems to be countable; consider using: 'few options'.
Suggestion: few options
...hes in thin air and are reduced to only few option. Also, the variety of choices are n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...are needed to be evaluated from another persons perspective as well. Consider a person ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...nvenience. If you look at it from first persons perspective, anyone could say that they...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ave failed to take into account another persons perspective along with the type of prod...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, then, well, while, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65014577259 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42535810573 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478134110787 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3952499968 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24745227357 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870100032332 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111801288742 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184688375643 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120375026257 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.