Eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent times, technology has been at the forefront of changing human lives and making it better, whether it be maintaining temperatures of our home or connecting to someone we love thousands of miles away. And to say the least, technology has given advances in many fields such as the environmental ones. Let's have a look at it.
Technology has led to revolutionalization of various techniques in many sectors that previously was delerious to the environment. In early 20th century, large industrial chimneys were a standard for any company producing manufacturing goods covering the entire area with polluted gases. But due to the advancement of electricity in recent time, the skyscrapers of chimeys have all but disappeared in most urban areas, which in turn reduce those gases by a significant margin.
Not only that, an advancement in technology has led a revolution in using energy resources which are less harmful and much efficient that burning fossil fuels, mainly renewables. Due to advancement in technology, various unknown sources of energy such as solar energy, hydal energy and wind energy in 1960s are now playing a key role to produce energy in various parts of the world. Due to these advancements, countries like Sweden are now almost entirely run on renewables.
And finally, certain advancements in technology such as data modelling is being used to incorporate certain data models that can be used to make a roadmap for the future. In the times when data has surpassed the value of oil, scientists are working relentlessly on the model that will give us certain insights over how to progressively solve these issues. The Paris Climate Agreement states that an annual increase in average temperature should be kept below 2 degrees, which was based on scientific data models described above.
The above examples clearly states that the technology was a pioneer in developing advanced models, revolutionize the energy industry and provided with models that can be used as a safeguard to ensure our future. So, it would be obvious to state eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-20 | SakshiA | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-07 | anirudh8860 | 89 | view |
| 2018-10-10 | bh@vana_17 | 82 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 67
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 63
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 60
- The bar chart shows the top ten countries for production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our students 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... fields such as the environmental ones. Lets have a look at it. Technology has le...
^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
...ar energy, hydal energy and wind energy in 1960s are now playing a key role to produce e...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20571428571 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00144726995 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5391667985 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145989676078 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579091497891 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108788520806 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877573858209 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859511258546 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... fields such as the environmental ones. Lets have a look at it. Technology has le...
^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
...ar energy, hydal energy and wind energy in 1960s are now playing a key role to produce e...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20571428571 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00144726995 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5391667985 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145989676078 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579091497891 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108788520806 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877573858209 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859511258546 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.