The line graph provides a comparison between visits to two new music websites during a period of 15 days.
Overall, the site Pop Parade was more popular than its counterpart Music Choice, with higher rates of visit during most of the surveyed period. Both websites finished 15 days with higher visits, but experienced wide fluctuations in between.
On day 1, there were 120 thousand visits to Pop Parade, three times higher than the figure for Music Choice. However, the number of visitors to Pop Parade dramatically declined to varying levels over the next 8 days, hitting its lowest level of around 30,000 on day 7. It then witnessed a steep climb on days 10 and 11. Meanwhile, Music Choice saw mild fluctuations in its rate of access from day 1 to day 11, with the figure hovering between 20 thousand and 40 thousand despite a moderate rise to 60 thousand on the third day.
On day 12, Music Choice overtook Pap Parade as the former experienced an almost vertical growth in the number of visits, reaching 120 thousand while the latter saw a significant decline. Music Choice managed to keep its leading position until day 13. Though its rate of visits topped at 125 thousand on day 14, it was overcome by Pop Parade, whose statistics peaked at 170 thousand on the final day.
- The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012 95
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music web sites Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music web sites Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74107142857 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46922625218 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598214285714 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4050617188 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.2 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102308398276 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517019368696 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617719647092 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944019599691 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736384180118 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.