The graph below shows electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2012.
The line graph illustrates electricity production from four different sources in France from 1980 to 2012.
Over this 32-year period, nuclear power were a largely the most important source of electricity in France while renewable energy always provided the lowest volume of electricity.
In 1980, thermal power plants were the largest source of electricity in France, generating approximately 120 terawatt hours. Meanwhile, power generation from nuclear and hydroelectric sources stood at moderate levels, around 75 terawatt hours. Just one year later, nuclear power overtook thermal power to become France's primary electricity source. From then on, power production from nuclear sources soared dramatically, peaking at 430 terawatt hours in 2005. By contrast, the figure for thermal power declined to its lowest level of 30 terawatt hours in 1988 and kept hovering at this point for the rest of the shown period. Hydroelectric plants provided quite stable amounts of electricity throughout these years, around 75 terawatt hours. From 1980 to 1996, power generation by renewables were negligible and the figure only saw a moderate rise from 2006 before reaching its highest of 25 terawatt hours in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-28 | M3hrrrrnaz | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-22 | minhtran224 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | VinaKhoai | view | |
| 2021-10-10 | khushboo choudhary | view | |
| 2021-08-12 | tungxuan | 79 | view |
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music web sites Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012 95
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music web sites Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54594594595 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73935151988 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6554672352 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249458044448 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117591323574 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748042465609 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192542649332 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976791104876 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.