Some people believe that in order to thrive, a society must put its own overall success before the well-being of its individual citizens. Others believe that the well-being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people.
The general perception that pervades the society is that well-being of a society should be measured by the general welfare of all its people. My position on this, aligns with this ideology that to survive and have a healthy community we need to take care and consider all the individual members satisfaction. I would bolster the aforementioned point through my two reasons.
Fisrtly, to survive in a dynamic society we need to understand our surroundings and observe the type of people living around. We need to classify the people in groups so that different people from different classes, based on financial parameters, family background, etc, can contribute equally to serve the society in their own ways. For example, if we have labourers and and shopkeepers in the society, we will have to give the labourer the work which he is adept at while the shopkeeper the work he is skilled at. This would promote a sense of fairness and happiness since the workers will be doing the job they genuinely enjoy. This way there is a sense of upliftment in all the individuals who work together harmoniously which ,in turn, helps to develop the society and bring a sense of well-being.
Secondly, for overall development of the society, we cannot forego a certain section of the people just to put a feign facade of development. We need to care for every persons nourishment and safety so that the pillars of the society which rests on every individuals back should remain steady and sturdy. For example, in a neighbourhood if there are very rich people, living flambouyantly and ostensibly while people around their homes are impoverised and have a miserable lifestyle, that society wont promote the notion of well-being. This kind of society will be full of disingenous people who lack empathy and are indifferent to their social surrounding. This will defintely prov deleterious to any type of society and is definitely not the society that a person could thrive freely.
On the other hand, sometimes the well being of a society could be put over the well being of its citizens, but this would be a blatant excuse and full of beguile people who are apthetic and to a certain extent misanthrope. These kind of qualities do not help a person thrive freely and are always under a cumbersome of uncanny emotions of treachery and deceit.
So, all these reasons help us conclude and understand how individual success of every person can help uphold the well-being of a society through mutual respect, love and empathy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | okazaki11 | 50 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | ramaand | 62 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 58
- Some people believe that in order to thrive a society must put its own overall success before the well being of its individual citizens Others believe that the well being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people 50
- Some people think that scientists make the most important contributions to society Other people think that the contributions of artists are the most important Which position do you agree with Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- TOEFL integrated writing fuel cell engines 60
- Do you agree or disagree technology has made children more creative than in the past support your answer with reasons and examples 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...ke care and consider all the individual members satisfaction. I would bolster the afore...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tioned point through my two reasons. Fisrtly, to survive in a dynamic society...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ways. For example, if we have labourers and and shopkeepers in the society, we will hav...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...als who work together harmoniously which ,in turn, helps to develop the society an...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ety and bring a sense of well-being. Secondly, for overall development of the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rtain section of the people just to put a feign facade of development. We need to care ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... development. We need to care for every persons nourishment and safety so that the pill...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y that a person could thrive freely. On the other hand, sometimes the well be...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...atant excuse and full of beguile people who are apthetic and to a certain extent misant...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...ic and to a certain extent misanthrope. These kind of qualities do not help a person thriv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny emotions of treachery and deceit. So, all these reasons help us conclude a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93411764706 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78864132065 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496470588235 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7642191355 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0625 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5625 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364225696045 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119209378244 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127749706632 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224643760236 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703288730395 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...ke care and consider all the individual members satisfaction. I would bolster the afore...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tioned point through my two reasons. Fisrtly, to survive in a dynamic society...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ways. For example, if we have labourers and and shopkeepers in the society, we will hav...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...als who work together harmoniously which ,in turn, helps to develop the society an...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ety and bring a sense of well-being. Secondly, for overall development of the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rtain section of the people just to put a feign facade of development. We need to care ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... development. We need to care for every persons nourishment and safety so that the pill...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y that a person could thrive freely. On the other hand, sometimes the well be...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...atant excuse and full of beguile people who are apthetic and to a certain extent misant...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...ic and to a certain extent misanthrope. These kind of qualities do not help a person thriv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny emotions of treachery and deceit. So, all these reasons help us conclude a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93411764706 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78864132065 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496470588235 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7642191355 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0625 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5625 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364225696045 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119209378244 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127749706632 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224643760236 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703288730395 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.