The pie charts provide information regarding the labour force in three selected sectors in two towns in the years of 1960 and 2010.
In 1960, manufacturing-related jobs attracted the highest proportion of workers in both places, followed by sales and service. In particular, 70% of the town A's workforce worked in manufacturing sector, compared to only 41% in the town B. While sales and service in the former were accounted for around 29.5% each, those figures in the latter were recorded at only 20% and 10% respectively.
After five decades, 64% of the labour force in town A worked as service staffs, more than double its 1960 proportion. Conversely, the other two sectors in this site had seen considerable declines by almost half by 2010, recorded at around 18%. Manufacturing had remained its leading position in town B despite a sharp drop by nearly 20%, compared to slight increases in the figures for the local sales and service sectors, reaching 25% and 22% respectively.
Overall, manufacturing workers saw the highest proportion in both places in 1960; however, it had observed a significant decrease and lost its first rank in town A by the end of the period surveyed.
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 78
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods 78
- The table shows the consumer durables telephone refrigerator etc owned in britain from 1972 to 1983 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 62
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries 79
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, regarding, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99467268382 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9652610167 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250374009685 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116822095504 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108016021813 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171520779499 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111016690212 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.