The table shows the percentage of journeys made by different forms of transport in four countries, The bar graph shows the results of a survey into car use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares four countries in terms of the proportion of journeys undertaken by five modes of travel: car, bicycle, public transport, walking, and other. The bar cart gives the findings of study into reasons people in the USA drive.
Of the four countries compared the USA was heavily reliant on cars, with only a small proportion of journeys made by other means (only 10 percent in total). The Netherlands, in contrast, showed a more even distribution of travel modes with fewer than half of all journeys made by car, a relatively large percentage made by bicycle (28 percent) and nearly one in five on foot. France and the UK fell between these two extremes.
The survey results shown in the bar chart may help explain why car use is higher in some countries than the others. The most-cited reasons were the lack alternative means of transport (38 percent) and the need to use a car for work (28 percent). However, the convenience was also an important factor for over 20 percent of respondents.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-07-14 | leminhthong098 | 89 | view |
2018-06-04 | Valeria Surkina | 80 | view |
2015-05-07 | supbro119 | 80 | view |
2014-01-19 | wiwik novianti | 83 | view |
2014-01-19 | AJIGAYUH | 77 | view |
- The most important consideration when choosing any career or job is having a high income To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown 71
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household works To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table shows the percentage of journeys made by different forms of transport in four countries The bar graph shows the results of a survey into car use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 89
- there is a good deal of evidence that increasing car use is contributing to global warming and having other undesirable effects on people s health and well being what can be done to discourage people from using their cars 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76436781609 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60327065442 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4417270633 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.625 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226102770471 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840574806083 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602552888027 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144766322455 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016710513573 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.