Recently, the phenomenon of in cities and towns in all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the high volume of traffic is a problem can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, in cities and towns in all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, in cities and towns in all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of In cities and towns in all over the world far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
- In cities and towns in all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of the this and What action can be taken to solve this problem 85
- In cities and towns in all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of the this and What action can be taken to solve this problem 63
- Government should reduce their investment in arts music and painting Agree or disagree 62
- In this technological world the number of new inventions has been increasing Please describe a new invention and determine whether it will bring advantages or disadvantages 84
- Government should reduce their investment in arts music and painting Agree or disagree 94
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26804123711 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10535817116 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563573883162 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.9645929129 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.363636364 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396250071233 0.242375264174 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142446147668 0.0925447433944 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120544838904 0.071462118173 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238338819836 0.151781067708 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752017044552 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.