The bar chart gives information about the American people's frequency of eating in fast-food restaurants over a 10-year period.
Overall, most of the population fell into two categories of fast-food consuming frequency, which were once a week and once or twice a month. By contrast, fewest people ate in fast-food restaurants every day between 2003 and 2013.
As the graph shows, more than 30% of the USA population ate fast food in restaurants once a week in 2003, while the figure for people who ate once or twice a month is relatively close, standing at 30%. The figure for the former group witnessed a decline to about 27% in 2013, while the percentage of the latter group saw an increase to around 33%, surpassing the former group. Fewer people ate in fast-food restaurants several times a week. The figure for this group was approximately 16% in 2003 and rose to exactly 20% in 2006, before dropping to just above 15% in 2013. Similarly, people who ate in fast-food restaurants a few times a year accounted for about 13% of the population. This figure increased to exactly 15% in 2006 and remained constant in 2013.
On the other hand, people who ate in fast-food restaurants every day and those who never did accounted for about 4% and 5% of the population, being the smallest sectors. The figures for both groups saw a decrease in 2006 to 3% and 4% respectively, then remained stable in 2013.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the fewest'.
Suggestion: , the fewest
...k and once or twice a month. By contrast, fewest people ate in fast-food restaurants eve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'account'
Suggestion: account
...rants every day and those who never did accounted for about 4% and 5% of the population, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77459016393 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69684276472 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52868852459 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0874898014 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.909090909 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377234118865 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171210841807 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132302565098 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242383203125 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578015328324 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.