Many people believe that best way to produce a happier society is to ensure a that there is small differences of earning between the riches members. and poorest members. ( agree or disagree ).
It is clear that many people always desire to have a well-being in their daily life. It is argued that one of the optimal suggestion to create a joyful society is narrow the level of wealth between the richest and the poorest citizens. From my point of view, i strongly disagree with this idea because of the following reasons.
The first reason is that health is always the most invaluable people’s asset to have a desirable life. It is true that a great mental and physical health will afford us more positive energy to tangle the challenges in our life. In addition, if your want to possess a huge property, you must own a vigorous health to earn for your living and then to enjoy your life. According to a survey collected from a US Community Center in 2018, more than 60 % of the Americans regarded health as the most vital part in their life.
Apart from the practical concerns expressed above, i also suppose that a safe community is a secure factor contributing to the citizens’well-being. Indeed, an enjoyable life cannot be ensured if people must face up with dangers from natural disasters, social evils, war,...An remarkable example is that Japanese have to struggle with terrible earthquakes year by year. It does not matter how much money they have, they cannot use it to prevent it.
Taking intoo consideration all of these facts, wealth gap also should be encouraged to curb for a delighted society. However, i completely reckon that it is not the best policy to bring satisfaction for people, the rich health and the face life are much more necessary in the community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is clear that many people always desi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idea because of the following reasons. The first reason is that health is alway...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as the most vital part in their life. Apart from the practical concerns expres...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...rom natural disasters, social evils, war,...An remarkable example is that Japanese...
^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: An
...natural disasters, social evils, war,...An remarkable example is that Japanese hav...
^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
...natural disasters, social evils, war,...An remarkable example is that Japanese hav...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earthquakes'' or 'earthquake's'?
Suggestion: earthquakes'; earthquake's
...Japanese have to struggle with terrible earthquakes year by year. It does not matter how mu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave, they cannot use it to prevent it. Taking intoo consideration all of these ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, well, apart from, in addition, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77536231884 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.745980417 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.933971884 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.833333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.082312070167 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294603087635 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310758229438 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0527495834181 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407500857364 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.