In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work, and communicate online without any face-to-face contact with other people. Is this a positive or negative development?
Owing to the digitalization, these days, many activities are possible without any physical interactions. Although digital ways of shopping, working, and communicating are convenient and economical, in my opinion, their detrimental effects such as relationship conflicts and fraudulence make them a negative development.
Undoubtedly, due to the surge in digital technology, people can now save time and money and can lead a comfortable life. This is because of multiple reasons, firstly, with the help of online shopping people can receive their favorite items at their doorsteps in no time with just a few clicks on mobile. As a result, they can save a huge expenditure on petrol consumed for supermarket trips. Secondly, communication has become quite easy and convenient due to the availability of applications such as Skype, WhatsApp, and many more, through which people can communicate with anyone without actually visiting their places. Moreover, digital advancement has benefitted the employees also, as nowadays, most people work from home using the internet which provides them the comfort of working according to their own schedule.
Despite the aforementioned advantages, I believe, this is a negative trend due to its numerous drawbacks. Primarily, less face-to-face interactions can create social and personal differences. To exemplify, according to the study by Hopkins University, 40% of the people are likely to become antisocial by the end of 2020, owing to the lack of interest in meeting others in person, caused by the huge influx in digital communication. Not only will this lead to issues with personal and social relationships, but it will also lead to people having issues within work because no facial interactions can easily create misunderstandings and conflicts with fellow colleagues. Additionally, online shopping can also lead to fraud and misleads. Some fraudulent people can easily hide the true identity of products while representing them online and can mislead their customers with fake reviews and ratings.
In conclusion, while digital purchasing, employment, and interaction provide convenience and ease, in my perspective, these developments are more negative in terms of social distraction and online scams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-27 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 84 | view |
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
- OVERPOPULATION in many major URBAN centres around the world is a major problem. What are the causes of this? How can this problem be solved? 73
- Some people like to work for a few months in a year and for the rest of the time they do what they like Do the advantages of this job pattern outweigh its disadvantages 82
- There have been some problems with the bus service, especially its reliability, in your area over the last two weeks.Write a letter to the manager of the bus company. In your letter• describe what the problems are• explain how these problems are 87
- Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for a long time should bepromoted to a higher position.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'colleagues'.
Suggestion: colleagues
...te misunderstandings and conflicts with fellow colleagues. Additionally, online shopping can also...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6275659824 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21045668142 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5082217385 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.071428571 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253344184584 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803726429935 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397910945965 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132880741117 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04262681871 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.