Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of workers who do different types of tasks during workdays are more satisfied than who do similar tasks for the whole day. If I were forced to choose, I will definitely agree with the statement. There are a few reasons that I will discuss in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, completing distinct tasks is more challenging without doubt. Although people will have more pressure when dealing with those chores, they will by contrast feel rather excited to face something new. After they have accomplished their work, their confidence will somehow increase. For example, my boss from my previous job seems satisfied to his job because of the numerous problems he has to solve everyday. Though he sometimes might seem exhausted handling with the tasks, he always tells his colleges that this is the best job he ever have had. Hence, it is an effective way to help workers fulfill their careers.
Secondly, handling with tasks with a wide variety may also push workers to develop potential abilities. Nowadays, companies are eager to search for employees having multiple skills. In other words, it is now a trend to constantly explore new talents. For instance, large corporations such as Facebook and Amazon tend to hire people who require various abilities, instead of ones who only require a single specialty. It is more important for students in modern societies to gain experience on everything. Yet, with the boosting possibilities to get a job, workers can be more satisfied when they obtain new skills.
In light of the above mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that workers can be more happy if they need to face different tasks during their work. It is because the skills they can develop and the fulfillment of their careers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage 70
- Solutions to prevent injuries of glass to birds 76
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea 60
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your o 50
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is Thus the project o 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...during workdays are more satisfied than who do similar tasks for the whole day. If ...
^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...f the numerous problems he has to solve everyday. Though he sometimes might seem exhaust...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...leges that this is the best job he ever have had. Hence, it is an effective way to h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 303.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99669966997 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59374866923 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607260726073 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6994715367 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0588235294 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338308340478 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884377576079 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936580108954 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205039626861 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100773901687 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.