Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, it is held a concept that government ought to improve the quality of the citizen’s life by spending their money on a path of the train rather than streets. From my perspective, I definitely agree with this idea because it helps people in many aspects, described in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, railways offer safely travelling than roads. As it can be seen that most of the accidents were emerged from the cars higher than in the train, for instance, the number of car accidents in Thailand in 2019, which is higher than in the train accidents for more than thousand cases. Therefore, upgrading the railways will ensure people that a train is secure sufficient to allow them reaching their destination with less concern, and bring them to use this transport.
The pollution problem in the country will be solved because of the altered habits of people that have changed their routine of commuting. In addition, Most of the cars are currently damaging our environment by releasing its carbon monoxide after its process of the machine that can cause many consequent issues, especially the global warming, which is one of the most worrying issues in the modern-day. Thus, if people use the train on the path that is improved by the government instead of using their own car on a road, the pollution of its surroundings will be decreased its quantity, and as a result, the quality life of residents will be better in the future.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with this statement since it seems to me that people in the country are going get many benefits from the improved and upgraded railways rather than roads, which have many accidents from the cars.
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...an in the train accidents for more than thousand cases. Therefore, upgrading the railway...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88850174216 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60970259943 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3666196751 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.888888889 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8888888889 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194089691798 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873342880744 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656022784558 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135439776833 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701367572681 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.