The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph provides information about how many individuals lived in India and China from 2000 and provides a forecast until 2050. Units are measured in billions of people.
Overall, it is clearly seen, that the population of India rose gradually and will continue this trend. In contrast, China's population will reach a peak in the middle of the interval.
In 2000, the figures for India stood at 1 billion. Then it sharply increased up until now. According to the given predictions, the population of India will be about 1.45 billion in 2030 that will overtake the number of citizens of China. Then it will continue to experience a moderate growth, hitting the top of 1.6 billion in 2050.
Meanwhile, the data for China was around 1.25 billion at the beginning of the period. Similarly to India, the quantity of people in China rose significantly in the first half of the provided interval. However, in oppose to the first country, the population of China will plateau in 2025 at approximately 1.45 billion. Then, after 2035 there will be a slight fall in the number of citizens of this county.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-04 | Lily Ha | 84 | view |
2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 10 | view |
2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
2023-08-18 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
2023-07-07 | qaptpa | view |
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people believe that technology has brought more harm than good Do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons In other words it is a governmental problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The chart shows the percentage of men and women living in poverty divided into ten different age groups in the United States in 2008 67
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...billion at the beginning of the period. Similarly to India, the quantity of people in Chi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86842105263 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62958345395 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7921547437 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0833333333 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216363705801 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083622692343 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520589502984 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141610080751 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321455358133 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.