Most people choose a career on the basis of such pragmatic considerations as the needs of the economy, the relative ease of finding a job, and the salary they can expect to make. Hardly anyone is free to choose a career based on his or her natural talents or interest in a particular work.
The speaker claims that owing to economic pressure, people are hardly free to follow their own talents and will but choose their job from pragmatic concern. Admittedly, sometimes people who are not born in wealth-dividend, are struggling for their sustenance so yielding to pragmatism. However, with the advance of society, nowadays people have more chances to pursue their will in their lives.
I concede that, from history, people usually succumb to the pressure of their living and therefore turn to find a job that can sustain their living. After all, we are living creatures: we need food to replenish the energy we consumed; we need various commodities to maintain our everyday life. All these material things need money. Compared to pursing the goal that fits your interest, having a stable job is sometimes indispensable. Take the famous scientist, Einstein, as an example. Before he won the prestige in the field of academics, he worked in a patent office for his livelihood. Although the task may be boring and routine, it is a practical choice that provided Einstein with the ability to sustain himself.
However, with the development of society, nowadays this world affords us more opportunities to chasing the goal that meets our interest and talent without sacrificing the livelihood. At school, there are various scholarship and financial support can be applied by talented students. No matter a student is adept in mathematic, science, or art, there is plenty of corresponding resources that can help them. In society, in contrast to those impecunious artists in the past, people who are skillful in the art field have more resources to promote their works. The Internet helps them promote their works on a global scale. Thus, more people can appreciate their works and support them. Considering that, if Van Gogh lives in modern society, the mishap: the only one paint was sold in his life, may not happen by virtue of the influence of the broad-covered media today.
Another reason that people today have more opportunities in choosing their job matching their interests and talents is that modern society is a society of cooperation. In detail, today’s society needs talented people in specific areas but not people who know everything. In ancient time, every family to contribute to the work directly to their livings, such as hunting or farming. By contrast, in modern society, people are work together in a cooperative way. Some people work in the food industry, some contribute themselves to constructing buildings while some people are in charge to entertain the public on media. As a result, humans don't need to perform routine work for a living. Instead, people who possess different skills are more valuable. In this sense, people have more chances and even be a necessity to develop their personal and unique skills.
In sum, in modern society, human beings have more opportunities to work in the fields that we are interested in or talented. It largely comes from the transition of the mode of our lives and also the plenty of resources nowadays provide to us.
- Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate Thus any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future 66
- It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data 16
- The study of history has value only to the extent that it is relevant to our daily lives 87
- Technology creates more problems than it solves and may threaten or damage the quality of life 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 440, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a cooperative way" with adverb for "cooperative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...odern society, people are work together in a cooperative way. Some people work in the food industry,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 640, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he public on media. As a result, humans dont need to perform routine work for a livi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, after all, in contrast, such as, as a result, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2594.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 510.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0862745098 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73627152401 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521568627451 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.38483146067 365% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3955704862 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0740740741 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13392312846 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383552830944 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039940329292 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744098717813 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427316155027 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 440, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a cooperative way" with adverb for "cooperative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...odern society, people are work together in a cooperative way. Some people work in the food industry,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 640, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he public on media. As a result, humans dont need to perform routine work for a livi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, after all, in contrast, such as, as a result, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2594.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 510.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0862745098 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73627152401 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521568627451 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.38483146067 365% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3955704862 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0740740741 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13392312846 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383552830944 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039940329292 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744098717813 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427316155027 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.