Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Educational Institutes are supposed to provide students with lots of knowledge from a variety of fields. And the students should be the ones who need to pick it up and decide their career stream. Pursuing a certain field of study should be a personal decision and one should live with it forever, with no regrets. Educational Institutes have no right on deciding what a student should pursue and whether he shall be successful in it.
Every student has a different potential and this potential may increase or decrease depending on a variety of factors. If a student is weak in "English" language, but has the genuine passion to be a translator, with enough practice and hardwork, he could excellent at it. Navjot Singh Siddu, a famous Indian Cricketer was often mocked due to his terrible English, and so one day he decided to prove the audience wrong. He practiced sincerely for many years and now he is one of the greatest English speakers in India.
Success is actually a relative term. For some students, success would be to have a big bank account, for some it might be the job satisfaction, and for others it might be service for the society. At the end what matters is that the person is happy. Educational Institutes might not be able to judge the individual student's happiness criteria, and hence their personal success.
If a student is taking a unique path, not taken by anyone before, does not mean that he will fail. Most of the successful businessmen have taken such untravelled roads and built their empires from unique ideas. With maturity and realisation, a person might do wonders.
In conclusion, educational systems have no right to persuade students to unfollow a certain career path. Potential can be developed with maturity and hardwork. Individual perspective of success is different, and hence no external factor should interfere in changing that perspective.
- Educators should take students interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 50
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 54
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 83
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and decide their career stream. Pursuing a certain field of study should be a per...
^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: AND_SO_ONE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'and so on' (="etc.")?
Suggestion: and so on
...ten mocked due to his terrible English, and so one day he decided to prove the audience wr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ght not be able to judge the individual students happiness criteria, and hence their per...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, if, may, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 317.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00630914826 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88238670743 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552050473186 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.884332682 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.1666666667 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166892609173 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554449646668 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657454951673 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932626410952 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682577693945 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and decide their career stream. Pursuing a certain field of study should be a per...
^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: AND_SO_ONE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'and so on' (="etc.")?
Suggestion: and so on
...ten mocked due to his terrible English, and so one day he decided to prove the audience wr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ght not be able to judge the individual students happiness criteria, and hence their per...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, if, may, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 317.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00630914826 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88238670743 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552050473186 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.884332682 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.1666666667 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166892609173 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554449646668 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657454951673 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932626410952 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682577693945 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.