One of the major problems that faces today’s governments is creating enough satisfactory housing for their increasing populations whilst still trying to protect the environment.
Discuss this statement and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
With the growing population of societies, governments struggle to provide the essential needs for their people. Among these primary needs, housing stands as the most challenging one. This is due to the fact that the decision-makers need to consider many environmental issues that emerge from building more houses. However, I believe that constructing more residential buildings is no more a problem since the modern design and construction methods have achieved a great progress in the field of saving the nature.
To begin with, the root of the problem might be that most of the building materials are manufactured by conventional ways that are likely to damage the eco-system. For example, concrete plants are known to be producing a huge amount of chemical wastes that could have a detrimental effect on the surrounding habitat. Another possible cause of the problem might be the amount of energy consumed by the construction of houses. To illustrate, heavy machinery used in construction like cranes and excavators can burn up to one hundred gallons of fossil fuel every eight hours of operation. The aforementioned examples show the severe effect of building houses.
However, I am convinced that constructing new housing units to face the increasing population is not exacerbating the environmental problems as before. Whilst the environmentalists are pressing the governments to stop building more houses, scientists and engineers have developped many novel technologies that are sustainable and enovironment-friendly. For instance, alternative building materials have been inaugurated and equipment that use solar power instead of fuel have been invented. As a result, if the state forces using these materials and equipment, the environmental imact of constructing new apartments can be significantly mitigated.
To conclude, despite being known as an environment-damaging process, constructing new houses is not as harmful to the nature as before. Due to the modern sustainable building technologies, governments can satisfy the needs of the people for houses while saving the environmet as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-01 | SOJI | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | Kaur_Aman | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | Kaur_Aman | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-05 | a7medelsayed | 77 | view |
| 2020-02-15 | mailtotimir | 56 | view |
- Many people support the use of animals for testing medicines for humans Others believe it isn t appropriate to use animals for such experiments Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- One of the major problems that faces today s governments is creating enough satisfactory housing for their increasing populations whilst still trying to protect the environment Discuss this statement and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 463, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great progress'.
Suggestion: great progress
... and construction methods have achieved a great progress in the field of saving the nature. To...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58878504673 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41760876769 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554517133956 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.924186593 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128861200949 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465492566509 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412228021377 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849449560867 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225927481833 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.