The bar chart illustrates the spending of consumer items on France and UK in 2010.
Overall, both the countries mostly spent all their money on cars, but the cameras are brought the least in France while England spent the least on perfumes. Moreover, the figures that saw the most difference are in the camera.
Both the countries spent most of their expenditure on cars, but UK figures are higher than that of France by 50,000. For the computers, there was only a slight difference in their figures with the number reaching 350,000 for UK and 370,000 for France. On the other hand, books are spent more in UK than France by 100,000-pound sterling.
Meanwhile cameras seem to have the most difference in their expenditure with UK bought these items is twice as compared to France, having over 350000-pound sterling. Perfumes figure was the lowest out of all the categories only touching 200,000- and 240,000-pound sterling with more money obtainable in France than in England.
- The two maps below show the Paradise island in the past and in the present 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- the graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comp 84
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 78
- The maps summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...an France by 100,000-pound sterling. Meanwhile cameras seem to have the most differenc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0243902439 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6242190986 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530487804878 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1757861007 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0801147618967 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468959739838 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668760035655 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744595209635 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738531675694 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.