The university has provided students who are going to enter university with two summer vocation programs. Which one do you think is better for students?
1) Take some college courses in advance. e.g. some courses that are related to students' major.
2) Visit some history museums or historical relics.
Nowadays, some students find it difficult to fit in the ambience of university when they just attended to the university. Sometimes, they spend plenty of time struggling in achieving the balance of studying, resting and socializing. So, in my opinion, the summer vacation program of taking some courses in advance is helpful for the students.
First, taking some courses in advance gives students the chance to know about the courses they are going to learn. In that case, it enables students to find the course which is most suitable for them to study for a long term before attending to the university formally. As the student figure out what they are most likely to study in university in the summer vacation, they could save wealth of time in deciding on subjects in the university. In addition, this may facilitate students making choices more wisely through their own personal experience rather than deciding just based on their own inclinations. For example, if a student has no idea about which subject to study in the university, taking a part in the program may help him to decide.
Second, most students are not familiar with ambience in university at all when they just attended to their university. Taking some courses in advance could help students adapt the ambience in university more rapidly when they enter the university formally. Therefore, they can save more time and perform better in after attending to the university formally. As they have already learned the courses before, they would find it more easily to learn the course again after entering the university formally which gives the confidence of studying to students. With more confidence, students are less likely to drop out. For the better case, some excellent students may have the ability to finish their major more quickly which can also save plenty of money for them.
Although the courses will be learned eventually in the university and visiting some history museums seems to be more meaningful than just having classes. After all the time is valuable for everyone, especially for the students who are going to enter universities. Making use of time in studying can make sure the time is not wasted at all.
In conclusion, students could generate more benefits in taking some colleague courses in advance. This also has both long and short term influence in their lives in university and change them for the better.
- As a student of university that has a long break between university semesters the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break 1 Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to thei 90
- Do you agree or disagree It is difficult for teachers to be both popular students like them and effective helping students in learning 60
- Minority languages should be protected by governments even if spoken by very few people They should be taught in schools as they are part of a country s culture and history 67
- Do you agree or disagree It is difficult for teachers to be both popular students like them and effective helping students in learning 73
- Parents should learn from children 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, after all, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03241895262 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56143354104 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438902743142 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9835852737 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.210526316 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42373984358 0.236089414692 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155079571684 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953693702531 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270231434855 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466679363375 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.