Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
It is argued that wild animals and birds have been achieved too much attention and too many relevant resources in the process of the campaigned protection. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this opinion.
On the one hand, nowadays, the reality of wild animals and birds are ominously detrimental. Firstly, the illicit hunt the endangered animals is still happening clearly. With the target of having money as much as possible, those nefarious people break the laws to hunt the animals. Although there are constant concern of people to wild animals and bird, the hunter still utilize any method to get successfully the animals without severely punishment. Actually, the hunters are deteriorating the inherent balance of the ecology of humans. Secondly, wild animals and valuable birds are on the edge of extinction which will create a huge impact on people's environmental life. People can see that there are more and more animals and birds are listed in red book. This totally demonstrate that the amount of those animals is on the remarkably fast decrease. Elephants is a telling example for it. This kind of animals is gentle and have an important role in several countries for instance Thailand, mountainous area of Vietnam and so on...However it is currently listed in the endangered animals because of the seriously hunt to get the tusks of elephants
For the purpose of contributing in the defense the wild animals and birds, I have several proposes for this campaign. Firstly, national leaders must have serious policy to people abiding. Besides that, government should impose the severe punishment on whom have the illegal actions to animals and birds. Secondly, all the organization which have relation to the protection animals should enhance the awareness of people about animals by holding some seminars and events about animals,or create more show about animals and birds to encourage people have the good behave with them.
In conclusion, it is not true to say that too much attention and too many resources are given to shield wild animals and birds from endanger.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-12 | Anh Thi | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | duchuynh | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-13 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | TuronKuzibaev | 51 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I totally disagree with this opinion. On the one hand, nowadays, the reality o...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1040, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...mountainous area of Vietnam and so on...However it is currently listed in the endangere...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1040, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...mountainous area of Vietnam and so on...However it is currently listed in the endangere...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sly hunt to get the tusks of elephants For the purpose of contributing in the d...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , or
...g some seminars and events about animals,or create more show about animals and bird...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople have the good behave with them. In conclusion, it is not true to say tha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13782991202 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67280777671 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513196480938 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.5785276755 49.4020404114 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398039086088 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123691621607 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124436872408 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309402077056 0.151304729494 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128416339572 0.056905535591 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.