The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
In the memo, the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company mentions that increasing advertisement for Super Screen Movies can attract the viewers as they are not aware about the quality movies Super Screen Movie Production Company has been producing. The conclusion thus drawn by the advertising director though contentiously convinces, however it is drawn under the basis of many unwarranted assumptions which when substantiated considerably weakens the assertion. To support the theme, following questions must be answered veraciously.
First of all, the advertising directory does not mention the type of movies Super Screen Movie Production Company might have been making recently which has got pretty good reviews. The movies that the production company have been making might not been in accordance with the viewer's choice. There are many of such movies which get the best reviews from the reviewers but have lesser viewers. The content of the movies might not have instigated the viewers to go for it causing lesser attendant for them. If this situation prevails, then the claim made by advertising director is seriously hampered.
Secondly, the actors performing in the Super Screen Movies might be of lower profile which people are not fond about. A movie runs mostly because of the lead roles and the one who play them. For example, a movie featuring Tom Cruise will get a better attention than someone who has yet to make a blueprint in a film industry. People are fond of the name that lads the show, even though it does not meet the expectation. If such a movie though good in content but bland with the actor choice have been made then even the advertisement won't give the necessary outcome which the directory has been thinking about.
Lastly, the director assumes that public unawareness is the root cause of decreased viewers however, no particular survey or study have been done to corroborate this statement. If only the director has surveyed a sample population and drawn the conclusion about viewers being unaware then the claim might be supportive but nothing as such has been done. So, there might be a case than the viewers are intentionally not attending Super Screen Movies or they are attracted towards something else present in the entertainment field. If this assertion is proven to be true, then the claim made by the directory does not hold water.
In conclusion, the claim as it stands now, deliberately lies under many unfolded assumptions which need to be specified before drawing a firm reasoning and result.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | Eurus Psycho Version | 55 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | riyarmy | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | Saket Choudhary | 68 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Tanvi Sanandiya | 55 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 66
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized 73
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 83
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 422 350
No. of Characters: 2115 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.532 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.012 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.646 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 144 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.733 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.327 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.327 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 55.5748502994 65% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2153.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 421.0 441.139720559 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11401425178 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69624973613 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 204.123752495 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479809976247 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 705.55239521 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4199528081 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.611111111 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3888888889 23.324526521 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 5.70786347227 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284123618564 0.218282227539 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871337195421 0.0743258471296 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966830378651 0.0701772020484 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155351207462 0.128457276422 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112443524705 0.0628817314937 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 98.500998004 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.