The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980, and 2000.
Write a report a university lecturer describing the information below.
The provided bar chart compares the different transportation systems in term of the percentage of citizens’ European country uesd to reach the office and return the home in three years: 1960, 1980 and 2000.
It can be seen clearly from the graph that with the widespread uses of car, the habit of people using bus declined significantly over time. The number of resident in European city in tube and train both fluctuate during the same period of time.
Turning to details, in 1960, initially most of the inhabitant in the European country used to commute either bus or tube, with the figures of 40% roughly and above 25% respectively, while a fifth of these Europeans used train and about 7% car usage. After two decades, the popularity of car and train soared noticeably meanwhile there was a decline in tube and bus. In this year, more people used train than any other transportation as their type of office conveyance nearly 38%, conversely, the tube and car was the least popularity among the four categories at 23% approximately.
In 2000, the scenario changed and the car went well ahead in these four categories with roughly 38% that could be observed. On the contrary, the bus seemed to lost its appeal as mode of transport, which only one in every fifteen people used to travel to and from their workplaces. In the case of tube, it retained almost one-fourth of the coummuters while the train usaege declined slightly and stood just above 20%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-11 | nguyen mai thanh thao | 92 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in three years: 1960, 1980 and 2000. It can be seen clearly from the graph th...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nd train both fluctuate during the same period of time. Turning to details, in 1960, ini...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctuate during the same period of time. Turning to details, in 1960, initially m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir type of office conveyance nearly 38%, conversely, the tube and car was the lea...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... four categories at 23% approximately. In 2000, the scenario changed and the ca...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n these four categories with roughly 38% that could be observed. On the contrary,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, so, well, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81274900398 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62671591797 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585657370518 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.1848293322 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.222222222 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181264775299 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736283830646 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536298703622 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1167051874 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261921934154 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.