Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
To lead, is to not only show authority over a group of people, but also to understand and take into consideration the needs and expectations of our subordinates. However, any decision, taken by any association, is a culmination of the discussions and harmony of the group, rather than the whims of just one person the leader. I agree with the given prompt, that the respect of one's peers is a more valuable asset than sound moral judgement.
Any group of people will look up to their leader for motivation and guidance. However, when the same leader is not able to convey these to the team, it creates a breeding ground for dissatisfaction. For example, if a President to a cabinet of ministers in a country were to empower his subordinates to take strong decisions, and motivate them by gaining their respect, it would create a more conducive environment for the workings of a government, whatever their stands on moral issues be. A united team, with a mutual respect for authority, will function smoothly, and may even lead to better policy making. If the same figure head were to let go of the feelings of his peers, and rather hold his moral grounds, possibly whims and fancies, above everything, it will act to be counterproductive. Ministers will be dissatisfied with a lack of unity in decisions and thus, might demotivate them from even trying to do their jobs well. Thus, a lack of respect towards a leader may lead to dissatisfaction and hence, a lower output from a team.
A dissatisfied group is an open call for betrayal. It is only natural for a person to search for avenues of approval and motivation, when its own authoritatve field stands against it. In this search for satisfaction somewhere else, treachery is an inevitable outcome. A football player, who does not believe his or her coach to be worthy of his respect, will look at other sources of encouragemnt, possibly from coaches of other teams. A lack of understanding with his or her own teacher, might push him to betray his own team and join the forces of the opposition. Hence, a to gain the respect of your peers is to ensure their loyalties towards you, irrespective of your stance on the issue. A lack of respect, and loyalties morphs immediately into betrayal.
It is a fact that just the respect of your peers does not ensure that your decisions are always right. Your team may be united in an unethical front, while you try to convince them of your moral front. Nonetheless, if you do not already have the reverence of your team, it is a slim possibility that they will abandon their beliefs and join your boat. If, however, they respect you and your decisions, they are more likely to take your view seriously and contemplate if they might themselves be wrong.
Being a leader is an amalgamation of infinite qualities. I doubt there is a single human who has the perfect formula for being a leader. However, I have come to believe that a leader who earns the respect of his peers, is far more likely to succeed even in the most outlandish of decisions, than one, who without even a semblance of respect, tries to push his own moral standing onto others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 58
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...h the given prompt, that the respect of ones peers is a more valuable asset than sou...
^^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: FIGURE_HEAD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'figurehead'?
Suggestion: figurehead
...ad to better policy making. If the same figure head were to let go of the feelings of his p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, thus, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2599.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 553.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69981916817 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81821165571 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462929475588 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 807.3 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8029768222 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.291666667 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0416666667 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70833333333 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179493649252 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571762213692 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036038595389 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107407236775 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02458736233 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.