The line graph illustrates the number of visitors having a tour on a Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, it is clear that the number of people choosing the island for holidays increased dramatically through 8 years, as enjoying holidays on land was the more popular choice most of the time.
In terms of tourist spending time on land, the quantity remained of 0.75 million in the first two years, before started to increase significantly to 1.25 million in 2012, and to 1.5 million in 2013. Afterward, the number of visitors staying on the island continued to stay at the same level for three years, just dipped a little in 2016 but rose to 1.5 million again in the next year.
Regarding tourists who chose to enjoy on cruise ships, the number fluctuated between 0.25 and half a million from 2010 to 2013. Having a holiday on a ship then became a popular choice, as the quantity saw a dramatic rise. There were a million visitors in 2014, as twice as the year before. The number continued to increase and reached its peak of 2 million visitors in 2017.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- as countries develop their population tend to live individually small family In your opinion what is cause and what are effect on society Is it a positive or negative development 56
- The maps show the change of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city 83
- Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers people lose the ability to communicate face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64210526316 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45197642029 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563157894737 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8322184937 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134506581682 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068094819086 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724610778554 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105248032261 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760223809274 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64210526316 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45197642029 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563157894737 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8322184937 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134506581682 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068094819086 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724610778554 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105248032261 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760223809274 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.