Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads
In recent years, the renovation of traffic infrastructure using national budgets has been subjected to lots of debate. Although some believe that railways should be more invested than roads, I consider that spending money for roads will be far more significant
It is true that in order to reduce air pollution and traffic jams, the encouragement of using public transportations, for instance, the subway becomes far more common nowadays. For this reason, the railways are taken into account in the concern of the government leading to the consideration of budgets expense. It is undeniable that the government should spend money on railways improvement, however, these budgets should be a priority for road construction for several reasons.
Firstly, roads are the foremost way for transportation despite any conditions. For example, for some areas which have lots of rocks and mountains, it is unfeasible to build a railway network in this disadvantaged case. In this circumstance, roads are effective substitution, which supports people to join in such difficult terrains. Secondly, roads are not only for transportation but also for trading. It is easy to see the range of big buildings from shop centers to restaurants along the main roads, which not only serve the local citizens but also attract tourists from other countries. Imagine that if the roads are always in a downgraded state, the customers will be in a state of unsatisfactory, which drives them to different choices in other places. As a consequence, the country will lose its attraction, which detrimentally impacts on the national economy.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the government should invest money on roads rather than railways because roads play important roles in transportation as well as the national economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thanh Phong B2407053 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Tấn Quý | 30 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thanh Phong B2407053 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Ngô Quốc Thắng | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 373, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...at the government should spend money on railways improvement, however, these budgets sho...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the national economy. In conclusion, it seems to me that the government shoul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3041958042 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10153262457 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562937062937 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5122472879 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.416666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341734120613 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116311004638 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143796738768 0.0667982634062 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256468538668 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136438046599 0.056905535591 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.