One of the biggest problems facing the world today is growing enough food to feed the ever-expanding population. Genetically modified foods are the best way to solve this issue.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, the global food system has major impacts on the population in the world and some arguments say that ensuring global food security is the most issue, which needs to solve by genetically engineered foods for achieving sustainable development goals. In my opinion, I totally accept this idea and the below essay observes the supporting factors to my agreement with the relevant illustration.
To begin with, moving towards a sustainable global food system by traditional methods will become more difficult as the worldwide population increase. Because traditional crop yield could not provide sufficient food with timely distribution required to avoid hunger for all while the global population will increase to 9.7 billion immediately in 2050, according to a report of the Food and Agriculture Organisation. Besides, bioengineered foods can be more resistant to disease, have a longer life than natural products, and improve crop productivity; thus currently these methods become a popular solution to resolve the food shortage problem in major nations.
On the other hand, genetically modified foods can have vitamins and minerals added to them through genetic modifications to provide greater nutritive benefits to those who eat them. Compare with natural products, genetically engineered foods have outstanding benefits about these sides. For example, the rice is fortified with vitamin Aby a genetic modification that is being produced in Japan. Therefore, genetic modification on crops is common in developing countries that residents do not always have access to reach of micro-nutrient fortification and supplement programs.
In conclusion, the global food system sustainability is a hugely complex but necessary objective. It does not only demand modern genetic technology but also requires the acceptance of communities while use genetically modified foods to replace traditional products. Consequently, because of the benefits of genetically engineered foods, these play an important role in the worldwide food security.
- The best way to tackle the problem of obesity is to educate people about healthy eating To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face Is this a positive or negative development 89
- One of the biggest problems facing the world today is growing enough food to feed the ever expanding population Genetically modified foods are the best way to solve this issue To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly in 2050, according to a report of the Food and Agriculture Organisation. Besid...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72368421053 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0903900618 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601973684211 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0430514806 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.0 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215415831545 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827610837184 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411106401314 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139209454965 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181675623572 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.