Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
It is barely possible to be humanly impeccable at their work all the time. Despite knowing this fact, the person might get uneasy if they were corrected in front of the large mass. Similarly, in this case, the teacher may also feel uncomfortable by alarming about their mistake while they delivering something in the classroom or meeting. So I will prefer to tell the teacher their mistake only after the event to save from themself embarrassment and keep a good relationship with the teacher.
First, amending the teacher's error while running class can embarrass him/her. Since the teacher is carrying the student expectation of flawless presentation, telling it in public might hurt their image. Moreover, sometimes, they are not in the position to correct it even they know about the blunder and pour a more humiliation to them. Consequently, they extremely lose the confidence in their skills of teaching.
Secondly, it can create animosity between the student and the teacher. Though it is right to notify the mistake of the teacher, things might not run in a positive or constructive way. In fact, the teacher can feel resentment with the student because of the impatient nature of the scholar cause him/her massive embarrassment. As a result, the student may have to face the wrath of the teacher. For instance, it is quite common in the south Indian system. It is evident that many students get a low grades as they were not a healthy relationship with the teacher. Most of the time, they got upset with the teacher with their behavior in the classroom and question hard about the content of the topic.
In conclusion, putting our remarks right after the mistake might be an ill effect for both teacher and student. In my view, it would be better to give the chance to the teacher to correct the mistake by telling them in private.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 80
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Companies that recei 73
- People have different ways of escaping the stress and difficulties of modern life Some read some exercise others work in their gardens What do you think are the best ways of reducing stress Use specific details and examples in your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects l 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...th the teacher. First, amending the teachers error while running class can embarrass...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87619047619 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64760001516 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546031746032 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5315084852 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3529411765 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119255078895 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420583680059 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330089853254 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804066046823 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186225245305 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...th the teacher. First, amending the teachers error while running class can embarrass...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87619047619 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64760001516 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546031746032 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5315084852 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3529411765 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119255078895 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420583680059 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330089853254 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804066046823 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186225245305 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.