Nowadays many children are playing computer games instead of doing sports activities. Why is it happening? Is it a negative or positive development?
It has been frequentely observed that juveniles invest a multitude amount of time on computer by playing games rather than coping with sports activities. What I personally rackon is that this is not a rational phenomenon, which strictly need to be avoided because of its negative consequences. Reasons that associated my argument are mentioned in the ensuing paragraphs.
To embark with, certainly there are mainly some dreadfull demerits to playing computer games insted of playing it on grounds. First and foremost, in front of screen, child can be allocated a huge amount to x-rays in their eyes. As a consequence, they shall reel with some eye griefs. For example, according to a survey conducted in India by IIM anand, almost 30% of youngsters infected with insomnia. In addition, child will soon become an arrogant person if they are playing games on computer. Since, it takes almost 8 hours to complete a game, children are not capable to interacting with other denizens.
Besides this, children may evolve a different kind of stamina by playing sports, which cannot be acquired at online playing. For example, it is found that children acquire more energy by running and burns it in just 30 second. Nevertheless, it is like impossible to develop energy by playing computer games. Similarly to pervious negatives another major demerit is security. If youngsters play computer games, they always have to fill up a form to participate in any game. In that kind if form they have to write down their personal details be it, address of living place and bank account number. Hence, they cannot feel safe and rely on that kind of security systems. However, by playing any sport on field, child cannot be asked to provide personal details in order to engage with gaming.
In conclusion, there are many negatives to playing games on computer, including safety and body issues to communication and health problems. Thus, I would perfer to play various sports and give a new path to our personal development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-22 | Shivam patel | 84 | view |
- The bar graph show the total manufacturing production in percentages Aisa Europe and the rest of the world 56
- The chart shows use of social media by men and women in Austrelia in 2007 and 2014 66
- Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state Do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans
- Some people think that rising communication usage of computers and mobile phones by young people has had a negative effect on their reading and writing skills.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...velop energy by playing computer games. Similarly to pervious negatives another major dem...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: ANALYSIS_IF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of'?
Suggestion: of
...o participate in any game. In that kind if form they have to write down their pers...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03293413174 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70007596144 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607784431138 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3864315002 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.4736842105 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5789473684 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224145918375 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665302104269 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059131275731 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140794444578 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258341809713 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.