individual learning or group learning
In today's progressing world, intellectuals every day, promote a new method of studying. They can be helpful for students to have the best performances. In general, there are two main categories, individual learning and group learning. Although group learning has its privileges, I think that individual learning's advantages outweighed from group learning. I will explain my point of view in the following paragraphs.
In the first place, in most cases, when youngsters gather together, no profitable work will happen. If we oversee the exception of Bill Gates and his colleagues and some other hand-count persons, we consider that the asserted statement is true. For example, when I with my colleagues decided to study together we did everything but study. No doubt, we would learn from each other in group learning. In theory, it can be so beneficial for all of us to share our thoughts and solve problems with varied minds. But in fact, there are several interesting things instead of studying did when some young gather together.
Furthermore, every person has individual learning-pace. when some people start learning a subject they should be sure that everyone gets the matter. So, inevitably they should adjust with the lowest learning-speed learner. In this situation, the learning process may be boring and tiresome for those who have higher speeds. We know that all people have special talents that are not the same. Thus, they cannot learn to have a high yield learning experience with each other.
All in all, I believe that individual learning is more profitable than group learning. It is because of the reasons that I have mentioned.
- Why people live longer nowadayd 85
- the government should spend money on sport or art 73
- Do you prefer to eat out or eat at home 70
- Should teenagers work while they are students 70
- Some people believe that competition for high grades motivates students to excel in the classroom Others believe that such competition seriously limits the quality of real learning 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ry person has individual learning-pace. when some people start learning a subject th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ry person has individual learning-pace. when some people start learning a subject th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
...not learn to have a high yield learning experience with each other. All in all, I believe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, for example, i think, in fact, in general, no doubt, in most cases, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 268.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16044776119 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81778188345 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.5557922019 48.9658058833 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.7894736842 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1052631579 20.6045352989 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431733371751 0.236089414692 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144848449767 0.076458572812 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180581378596 0.0737576698707 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295415971951 0.150856017488 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136679637701 0.0645574589148 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.