Should employers judge applicants by their online profile?
According to the modern and progressive world where we live, people try to utilize technological tools more and more. One of the most significant inventions in the twenty-first century is the internet, the global village. According to this advanced tool, many activities accelerate and inter a new and advanced phase. Nowadays, many businesses select their future employee based on online applicants. Some people believe that in this way time will save and the process is more transparent. Others stand on the other side, believing that online applicants would not supplant the in-person interview and paper-based processes. Personally speaking, I agree with the first group. I will explain my reasons in the following paragraphs.
The foremost reason is the importance of time in today's life. In today's modern lifestyle, a person has a wide variety of opportunities in every aspect of his/her personal life. To utilize the best opportunities, people should take time to select the best one and apply for the most preferred things. Online applicants are one of the time-saving methods that people can apply for many good occasions. Owed to the improvement in technology, a wide range of the region have access to the internet. So, you can send your application wherever you want. The place and time could not restrict people anymore. In the past, people had to attend an in-person interview in the first place, and present their profile by themselves. This is a time-consuming process, especially if you have to apply for many job opportunities.
In the second place, I should mention the problem with the offline process. In the past, people had to be face to face and announced their decision in person. It would be so hard to say disappointing things about a person But today, they can submit their resumes, applicants, licenses online. This new approach has lots of benefits. One of them is avoiding interaction between persons, and applicants will select based on their abilities.
Thirdly, in my opinion, most people introduce themselves written better and comprehensive than the speaking version. So, they have a good opportunity to talk about every aspect of their abilities and personality they want. There is no pressure on them to talk about the matter that they do not want to talk about. Additionally, they can say their opinion about the financial matters clearer in the online version. Moreover, is more manageable for employers to determine too. For example, they can monitor the applicants online and do not worry about the time limitation in the interview. Also, they can learn about the application as well as what they require.
All in all, based on the reasons that I have mentioned above, I believe that online applicants could be a good and beneficial supplant of the offline one. Offline applicants are not only time-consuming but also they have lots of problems which are arisen from the in-person interactions. In conclusion, employers can judge applicants by their online profiles easily. Because they are trustable and transparent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... say disappointing things about a person But today, they can submit their resumes...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2566.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15261044177 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8890858393 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483935742972 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 817.2 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0128688081 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.7575757576 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84848484848 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25370115933 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633390500178 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108875855818 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152552918585 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821746510663 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.