A university education is necessary to succeed in a career, to what extent to you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of "a university education is necessary to succeed in a career" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that a university degree might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a university education can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, a university education can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing the awareness of people and formal education are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the necessity of a university education to succeed in a career. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the benefits of university degrees and being a successful person distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, the lack of a university education might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of job opportunities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of succeeding in a career can relate to the reality that the demerits of unskilled people can pertain to the absence of education. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of having university degrees were correlated positively with getting more income, the local authorities would ultimately address the relationship between universities and industries. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of finding an appropriate occupation.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of a university education far outweigh its downsides.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-01-29 | honorrr | 88 | view |
2020-08-25 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
2020-08-19 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
2020-06-29 | Gohar Khan | 76 | view |
2020-06-04 | baharehsiami | 88 | view |
- The graph bellow shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Television serves many functions Watching TV makes us relax We can learn knowledge and information from TV programs Besides TV can also be seen as a companion To what extent do you agree with this 77
- The plans bellow show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 67
- Business whether big or small is to maximize profit Do you agree with that Give your opinion 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78048780488 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38133877413 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602787456446 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1509979457 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.818181818 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264007561649 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996767418894 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686207584075 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158845611862 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050982317895 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 53.1260098522 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.