The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The main purpose of the paragraphs are to provide data pertaining to the amount of billions earned from different exported categories and how these products change, reported in the term of 2015-2016 in a country.
The gist of the bar chart is that the highest numbers of billions were from petroleum products whereas in the table, textiles had the biggest change compared to the others.
Commencing by the bar chart in 2015, petroleum reached the largest number although textiles had the smallest number which is just over 60 billion for the former and about 25 billion for the latter. Furthermore, the trend dramatically dropped from engineered goods (around 67 billion) to gems and jewellery (over 40 billion) to agricultural products (31 billion). However, in 2016, engineered goods, 61 billion and petroleum products, 62 billion had a rapid difference which was the same as agricultural products, 30,5 billion and textiles, 31 billion.
Turning to the point of table, though gems and jewellery decreased 5.18%, the remaining categories increased significantly which were noticeable by the textiles' growth of 15,24%. The second large growing number belonged to engineered goods which were 8.5%. While that, petroleum products improved 3% and agricultural products rose 0.81%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-09 | chargedbyfaith | 73 | view |
- Some people think online courses will soon replace traditional courses thanks to the benefits it brings about While other claim that traditional courses cannot be replaced Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The first pie chart shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second pie chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'textiles'' or 'textile's'?
Suggestion: textiles'; textile's
...nificantly which were noticeable by the textiles growth of 15,24%. The second large grow...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78522889544 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1890807134 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981941322117 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462145465618 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561076158187 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782067516891 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608267620158 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.