In days of yore, people took it for granted that women had to do all housework without any help of other family members, especially their husbands. With the number of career women increasing, however, some people, particularly feminists, start to challenge this gender-biased concept, suggesting that men and women should equally share household chores. From my perspective, in spite of some manageable demerits, this egalitarian belief should be greatly promoted.
Admittedly, we cannot be oblivious of some drawbacks of this gender-equal trend. One of the potential downsides is that men are less experienced in dealing with household chores, and this is due to the fact that according to many countries’ customs, there are fewer men taking an active role in doing housework. As a result, they might end up finishing the housework in a less perfect way, which can lead to unnecessary quarrels between couples, and impeding/hindering their family relationship. Nevertheless, this is little likelihood of this situation happening because wives can provide some tips and guidance for husbands about how to share household chores like sweeping the floor and doing the laundry.
The rationality of splitting housework equally should be recognized for the following reasons. First and foremost, there is no biological determinant for doing household chores. No gender is physically predisposed to do the dishes or dispose of garbage. Second, imposing all housework on women is unfair given the fact that their role in the modern society has been changing tremendously over the years. Just like their fathers and husbands, women are also dedicated to daytime’s work, suffering work-related stress and anxiety. Therefore, after one day’s hard work, they need to have proper rest as men do; otherwise, they will be overwhelmed with fatigue and stress, eventually compromising their mental and physical health.
In addition, splitting household duties evenly is conducive to facilitating gender equality, creating an environment which puts an emphasis on mutual support and esteem. If parents share housework, they will convey to their children that women and mothers are not synonymous with household chores. In other words, every family member should be accountable for household duties. Even better, sharing housework duties is an effective way to express love and care to people we love, which is conducive to strengthening marital relationship and family bond.
In conclusion, the benefits of this irresistible trend far outweigh its drawbacks despite the fact that splitting household drudgery evenly will trigger some conflicts. Hence, it is justifiable to argue that both of men and women should share housework.
- Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn about news While others believe that more effective way is through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Nowadays as women and men have to work full time household duties should be equally divided Do you agree or disagree 56
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same numbers of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same number of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- International tourism is now more common than ever before Some feel that this is a positive trend while others do not 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2307.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51913875598 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97054536848 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574162679426 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0219896244 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.421052632 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114722452134 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374508292585 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296947609686 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689694151226 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177191013334 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.