Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs. therefore, it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement.
In this era of modernity women play a magnificent role in every field. Presently, women are spending maximum hour on their jobs so it is necessary that domestic work is equally devided among men and women. Here, I would like to accord with the given statement.
Manifold points are there to support my point of view. Women feel stress free if they get help in house work by men. To illustrate, plethora of whole day work makes women tired and physically weak. They have to work on house.Therefore, it is necessary to reduce their burden by helping in their work. Apart from it, working women can pay more attention on their juveniles if men share household task. For example, hectic schedule of women create differences between children and parents. Mothers who do jobs are unable to confer proper caring such as eating, talking, playing, to the children and this create less intimacy between them. Thus, women can get some time for children if they get help from men.
Further emphasising on my point of view. In this male domineering society women are supposed to be less valuable in work. so,it is important to confer equal work to both the genders because men think that domestic work is a piece of cake. They do not give values of women work. Thence, Men will definitely understand the value of their work if they helps women in family work.
To recapitulate, Undeniably, work is imperative in this inflation era. However, still I believe that both the genders must share join responsibility of everything.
- the importance of teachers is diminishing due to increased availability of alternative resources to students. to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement . 56
- some people think that the advantages of advertising sports products through famous sports players outweigh the disadvantages. to what e do you agree or disagree. 56
- The map below the center of a town called Oslo as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
- The table below shows the population of three cities in 1990 the population forecast of 2000 and the actual of 2000 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 76
- the chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ically weak. They have to work on house.Therefore, it is necessary to reduce their burden...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...children if they get help from men. Further emphasising on my point of view. In thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...e supposed to be less valuable in work. so,it is important to confer equal work to...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...supposed to be less valuable in work. so,it is important to confer equal work to bo...
^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...erstand the value of their work if they helps women in family work. To recapitul...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd the value of their work if they helps women in family work. To recapitulat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58322707677 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3160723625 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.0555555556 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4444444444 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0570289175105 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0217913396699 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278515049077 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0345965240189 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225917256106 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.