The pie chart illustrates the attributes that job seekers and business owners believe are crucial for an applicant to have. The values are given in percentages and thousands.
Overall, it is clear that the level of education is the most important factor that employers consider in job applications according to the applicants. This is followed by work experience, while references appear to be a negligible indicator for securing a job. On the other hand, employers majorly lookout for a candidate with organisation skills, whereas the least is having an innovative idea.
Regarding the pie chart, approximately two-fifths of the prospective applicants believe that the majority of potential employers seek applicants with an appropriate level of education. Furthermore, half of the applicants claimed that technical skills and work experience seems to remain a vital factor, while references and passion and enthusiasm together accounted for 11%.
Moving to the bar chart, it shows ten employability skills that employers look for in a job seeker as mentioned in advertisements. 100,000 managers seek an organised staff, while half of this is required for a committed and passionate worker. It is interesting to note that having a degree is the sixth quality employers want, in contrast to job seekers opinion who thinks it is the major factor.
- Some people consider art to be essential and others think it is not Which view do you agree with and why Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The internet has vastly increased our access to information To what extent do you think this is a good thing Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You should spend about 40 minutes on this ta 84
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Is it a positive or negative development 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
... given in percentages and thousands. overall, it is clear that the level of educatio...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted for 11%. Moving to the bar chart, it shows ten employability skills that e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, look, regarding, thus, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31904761905 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06640415913 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561904761905 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3313268022 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.7 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167024679581 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739857592922 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562781176741 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109973071536 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573919722333 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.