The given pie charts give an analysis of the monetary allocation for five categories, namely staffs’salaries, furniture and equipment, resources and insurance of a United Kingdom-based school in three separate years 1981, 1991, and 2001.
In general, it can be seen that the cost of staffs’ salaries represented the biggest proportion of the school annual budget, while the insurance displayed an opposite trend which accounted for the least figure among the surveyed categories.
The payroll given to teachers had an upswing by 10% in the early 80s to comprise half of the total payment in 1991. This sector then illustrated a drip of 5% by the beginning of the twenty-first century. A steady rise was witnessed in insurance with the investment being at merely 2%, 3%, and 8% respectively.
Furniture and equipment were seen that both decrease first and then increase. The expenditure in 1991 was only one third as much as it was 10 years ago. Nevertheless, it made a considerable growth and stood at 23% after a decade. Also, resources e.g. books and other employees’ payment were the same in the tendency of being downward to end at 9% and 15% respectively even though there was a little increase occurred in the salaries of other workers in 1991.
- The chart below shows information about students studying in six major subjects at the US university in 2010. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, e.g., first, nevertheless, so, then, third, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00952380952 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00620673134 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638095238095 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9929573972 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0935851611091 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308240847363 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473255122863 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607342347738 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566776677275 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.