Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is positive development, while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different on what influences international commercial activities and exchange culture bring to the community. While some people opine that it would pose the threat to the identity of a nation, I do believe that the growth of global trade and cultural tolerance can contribute to the prosperity of each nation.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why people think that globalization menaces their cultures. First and foremost, the invasion of foreign cultures strongly affects young generations who are impressionable. For example, some teen Asians might get accustomed to behavior and fashions of Western culture that is usual for Western people but it is immodest for Asia countries. Another reason is that borderless trade creates a competitive market. This results in many wars and conflicts between countries. In fact, the development of economy requires the sources of energy, nations which are lack of these sources would invade other ones to ensure their needs.
On the other hand, the collaboration between nations has also generated a lot of benefits. Firstly, this phenomenon would improve the economy thanks to the in-export increase. Indeed, international business offers more jobs, local people would have many opportunities to promote in their careers, which makes profits for their countries and also reduces poverty and social evils. Secondly, the interaction between nations is a superior chance to establish international relations.For example, in 2020, most of poor countries in the world have been struggling with the pandemic, Covid-19, in a lack of healthcare equipment. Only by international support can these nations overcome the outbreak, which strengthens ties nations’friendship and reduces conflicts and wars.
In conclusion, although globalization have several adverse impacts on some aspects of countries. However, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that the advantages of increasing contacts around the world outweigh the drawbacks of this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | nguyenanhquan | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | thanhtu000 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | thanhtu000 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-06 | phucphuc71 | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | Linhjane | 92 | view |
- People often find it difficult to adapt to new situations in their lives Why do you think this is Whay measures can you suggest to make it easier 89
- Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is positive development while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 89
- Immigration has a major impact on the society What are the main reasons of immigration To what consequences can it lead 84
- In order to solve traffic problems governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ce to establish international relations.For example, in 2020, most of poor countrie...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61513157895 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04637055008 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585526315789 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6522560548 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243489762148 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702074593079 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046215802066 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131794954978 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422651421103 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ce to establish international relations.For example, in 2020, most of poor countrie...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61513157895 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04637055008 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585526315789 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6522560548 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243489762148 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702074593079 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046215802066 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131794954978 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422651421103 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.