TPO 63 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to su

Essay topics:

TPO 63: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples

Charities and NGOs are spreading more than the past time in the world. However, there are more people needing these aids provided by such aiding agencies on account of raise in population. Whereas some believe that people were more sympathetic to each other in the past, I agree with the statement that today people tend to help more. There are two main contributors to my view point which are the expensive cost of basic products to some economically-weak people and the wide spread materialistic behavior among them. Both of the justifications are well illustrated as bellows.
As a threshold matter, most of basic demands of every individuals cost more than before. According to the high inflation in our country, every goods are growing in price; therefore, those low paid can difficultly buy their essential demands. This issue get worse in poor category of society. The increase of poverty in any communication, makes all of the citizens extremely impressed; accordingly, they are more willing to help such miserable group of people who are under serious financial pressure. On the other hand, less poverty seen in the society emanated from small population and low rate of inflation in last decades; so, there were lower need for other citizens' aid to stand against such crisis.
Furthermore, the advancements in industry caused profound effects in people's lifestyle. Middle-class financial groups of the communities are more exposed to materialistic since they can afford quite a few life stuffs. There are a lot of cloths and food materials that such people buy to satisfy their mundane demands. Meanwhile, when they are tired of an old product, instead of disposing it, they dedicate them to some one they do not know; particularly, to the charities. Although the cloths or some types of foods are considered as inferior ones, they perform well and can be utilized by poor people being unable to pay for the premium version.
In succinct, offers to those unknown members of society have been intensified in recent years. Two factors, according to the article are responsible for this phenomena. Large proportion of poor people influencing the rich categories and materialistic trends that are prevalence among well paid groups constitute the paramount contributors.

Votes
Average: 5.9 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-25 Percival Wong 73 view
2022-09-13 mmorteza 80 view
2022-09-14 mmorteza 73 view
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user amininilooffar :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...es and NGOs are spreading more than the past time in the world. However, there are more p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... of poverty in any communication, makes all of the citizens extremely impressed; according...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
... of disposing it, they dedicate them to some one they do not know; particularly, to the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ding to the article are responsible for this phenomena. Large proportion of poor peo...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19836956522 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87772508929 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.013383156 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.277777778 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312817428779 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820800568476 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739263802245 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168451338191 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847625116469 0.0645574589148 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.