Prosperous countries handling the power of today’s world are those which have achieved to their desired goals by prioritizing other kinds of progress beside having improved economy. Therefore, it seems to me that advocated of having aims toward the boosting economy have a superficial view than other people who consider added proposals too, and I will explain why.
On the one hand, people who assume only economy prosperity in countries may believe that solving some fundamental problems such as poverty, joblessness, lack of proper healthcare, and poor education can only achieved by economy progression. For example, people who have sufficient livelihood resulting from healthy economy would have more concentration on their careers that itself can increase a society’s revenue. This means that, by doing high quality projects and also more efficient businesses the public-private partnership would be highly increased, creating a flourishing economy. Besides, by creating new job opportunities for citizens the problem of poverty can be ameliorated.Furthermore, they point out that poor education and healthcare system can be improved by dedicating budgets for these sections that it becomes practical merely by economy boost because it helps inject money into society.
On the other hand, people who consider other aspects of prosperity beside economic progress may consider political relationships with other countries which can improve the economy too. For example, there are trade’s contractions among countries which have benefits for both sides, and increase their revenues by opening up drains of exports and imports. Furthermore, some agreements that facilitate people’s traveling to counter-countries can increase visitor’s general information about the destination, causing the most aware people. This means that, they may rectify some inappropriate conventions in their own countries because of the new horizons opened to them by experiencing new things in abroad.
To conclude, I would tend to side with opponents of merely considering economic progress as an aim for a country. I feel that improving political relations can be counted because it would improve a society economically too.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admissions to museums outweigh the disadvantages 92
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 67
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...e problem of poverty can be ameliorated.Furthermore, they point out that poor education and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople. This means that, they may rectify some inappropriate conventions in their ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, for example, i feel, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74848484848 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16251141035 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584848484848 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.9510988013 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.083333333 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17158310609 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696075709408 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486678151302 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113295179848 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485473393851 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.