The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015.
The column chart illustrates the number of waste collecting by a recycling centre over five consecutive years, starting in 2011.
Overall, while the figure for the paper was consistently the highest from 2011 to 2021, and from 2014 to 2015, the majority of waste in 2013 belonged to glass. In addition, throughout these years, the waste garden was always the least among the four categories.
As can be seen from the column chart, the paper was the most waste collected by the recycling centre in 2015, which accounted for 70 tons. Next came the number of paper in 2011, at 57 tons, which was 17 tons as large as that in 2013, at 40 tons. Also, the figures for waste paper in 2012 (50 tons) and in 2014 (51 tons) were marginal. It is noticeable that the gaps between the numbers of waste glass did not change a lot from 2011 to 2015, which made up approximately 6 tons.
Regarding the last two kinds of waste, the number of collected waste tins hit the lowest point of 27 tons in 2007. Nevertheless, over 33 tons of tins went to each other year, such as 35 tons in 2011, 34 tons in 2013, 33 tons in 2014, and 39 tons in 2015. Consequently, the largest number of the waste garden was in 2015, at just 35 tons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart and table give information about health resources and life expectancy in different countries 73
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia present and in future 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35398230088 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35280095449 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522123893805 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.571528239 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.4 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320446337487 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146963593212 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115504836924 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228265838889 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084846505303 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.54 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35398230088 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35280095449 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522123893805 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.571528239 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.4 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320446337487 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146963593212 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115504836924 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228265838889 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084846505303 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.54 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.