Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people
Science have always been the revolutionary field that transforms the whole world such as the invention of internal combustion engines that facilitate to commute from one place to another in a very short time. Moreover, the invention of electricity has helped the mankind in every means. Therefore, I would agree with such statement that scientist should work for the betterment of its society.
For example, the scientist have done extensive research in field of medicine such as the invention of diagnostic of cancers at an early, transplantation mechanisms of organs and treatment of various life threatening disease etc. Hence, with the help of invention and research by the scientist it is possible to find and cure such diseases, which otherwise would not have been possible. Therefore, if scientist carry out their work in path of betterment of human, then such work would be appreciated and would be beneficial for betterment of humans.
Furthermore, as the previous example reveals the scope of scientist's work. However, if the advancement is carried out that does not benefits the human race and its society. For example, the invention of robots in recent time has revolutionized the whole world, its applications has increased in various manufacturing industry because it is proving to be more profitable than humans. Thus, it is replacing humans and their role from such industry thereby leading to unemployment and instability among human race. Therefore, such invention that benefits only the limited groups of society is not desirable.
However, it is not necessary that every scientist work should benefit large number of people because it is not possible to include such principle in every field of study. For example, if scientist is researching in the field of cosmology. Then his work will only include the information and the advancement as well as the research of planets, stars etc. That work would neither be beneficiary nor detrimental for every human being.
In sum, scientist and researchers should work with an aim to give its benefit to multitudinous number of people but, if it is helpful to only limited group that could lead to instability of society then such work should be avoided.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Sagar1234567890 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | TiOluwani97 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | shubham1102 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | wikoxa7293@ekcsoft.com | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-03 | abhikhanna | 62 | view |
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve 50
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Pl 54
- Nature s Way a chain of stores selling health food and other health related products is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville The store should prove to be very successful Nature s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas where re 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18941504178 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90069126641 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470752089136 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2811025123 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4375 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195506328717 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732760284528 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690397665633 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13090170523 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742573508565 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.