The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones
Teaching is the process of training or moulding someone to achieve the excellence in a particular field. It is the guide to provide the correct path to achieve ones aim or goal. But process of teaching is very consistent as well as constant process, it includes teaching, guiding, sometimes praising as well as scolding. Therefore, it has various components to carry out while teaching. Hence, I disagree with statement that the best way to teach is to praise positive action and ignore negative ones. This biased teaching may lead to various negative outcome.
For example, if a child is very adapt in his educational curriculum but wanting moral lessons. And if his parents who are his guider, in other words, are his teacher to guide him the correct path of life but if they continue to praise only his positive actions and ignore his negative ones, the child would definitely ignore the limits or the areas where he is lacking behind and would definitely consider such lessons as inconsequential. That child surely would excel in academic profession but would definitely fail in society as well as it would leave no scope of improvement.
Furthermore, It is sometimes, however, it is required to praise the positive actions of the child because that praise bolster the confidence and encourage them to improve further. For example, if as child has done enough hard work then a little praise might enhance his spirit. But the praise should be limited and should also highlight the weak areas of child to improve further. For example if a child wants to be a footballer then his coach has to praise him along with pointing out the areas where he needs improvement. And if the coach only praises his strength and ignore his weakness then that child would not improve further and it may lead to overconfidence in him. Such collective positive praise and highlighting the negative points is the best way to guide or teach the student.
In sum, Teaching is an assiduous work which involves both praising and criticizing the child to always remind him the areas of improvement. Hence, only praising the positive and ignoring the negative ones would leave no room of improvement of child.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-29 | tester340 | 83 | view |
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing During the past year Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on the job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours Experts b 58
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 66
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 50
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client Homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last year that region experienced t 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90296495957 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66694939204 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458221024259 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3367903611 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373119097321 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1359197457 0.0831039109588 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157312009728 0.0758088955206 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254171531304 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996748984016 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90296495957 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66694939204 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458221024259 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3367903611 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373119097321 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1359197457 0.0831039109588 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157312009728 0.0758088955206 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254171531304 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996748984016 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.