Some people believe that universities should allow students to pass courses from different disciplines, since they believe this it the best way of real education. I mostly agree with this point of view and will discuss it in this essay.
Although there is not a rigid formula for being truly educated as the question asserts, I believe that since one of the main reasons of education is to flourish our talents, therefore this is essential to taste different fields in order to pursue our desired profession. For instance, we know some famous people who has changed their majors based on their interests. Among them one of well known Iranian poets, Mr Shahriar who went to university to become a doctor and after passing a literature class, he left university and started following poetry as his profession. Also attending multidisciplinary majors and classes, help people to create new things, for example Mr Bill gates started Microsoft platform by mixing technology and writing. Thus joining classes out of our fixed curriculum might be beneficial for educators to some extent.
On the other hand, if universities leave students free to choose classes amongst all majors, there would not act mature enough to pick topics and based on their personalities, it might be misleading and also risky for them, as well as the education system. Since they might be capricious and not sure about what they really want, and changing profession can lead them to a waste of time and energy. For example, one might keep changing major till their forties and not making any values for society as a work force until that age. Thereby universities must put a limit on the courses that students are able to attend during their studies.
In conclusion, from my personal stand point, letting students to seek various topics might be a double edge sword, therefore universities should make it possible while implementing some regulations in order to control its drawbacks.
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 83
- We are increasingly becoming dependent on computers They are used in business hospitals crime detection and even to fly planes What things will they be used in the future Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of 78
- many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problems as a result.Why do many working people not get enough exercise?What can be done about this problem? 84
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ted following poetry as his profession. Also attending multidisciplinary majors and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06790123457 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68845409084 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617283950617 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2802409042 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.833333333 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.21951772744 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170333521542 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602688668212 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519188482482 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103910509292 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130602900849 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.