Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other. Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages. Which type of communication do you prefer and why?
In today's world, the advent of innovations has made many lives easier and convenient, so that people can communicate without any fear and limitations. Technology provides a great opportunity for individuals to stay in touch with each other without any thoughts of losing their loved ones. People nowadays can not imagine their lives with no technology as their entire lives are now dependent on this advancement. Some people prefer to text people as a means of communication, whereas I strongly believe that connecting people over the phone is the best way of communication.
To begin with, communication can be done easily through phone, which makes people avoid any kind of misunderstandings that can occur on the text messages. Also, people do not have to deal with any sort of misspelling on the phone, as it can be only possible over text messages. For instance, a couple of years ago on my last day of school, I told my friend we would do a farewell party. Everything was organized by my friend and I. I was the one who had to bring cake. Unfortunately, I got sick and I texted my friend that I would not be able to come so arrange cake by herself. She misunderstood me and did not buy the cake because she thought I was kidding and I would come with the cake. She even waited for me and due to all this misunderstanding of text message, it negatively affected our friendship.
Furthermore, by communicate with people over the phone can be beneficial as people can respond quickly in any situation. Since no matter how far away people can be from the phone, one long ringtone can aware that someone's calling. For example, last year, my dad had to go to the office on Sunday for an urgent meeting. He switched his phone from calls to text messages only. At that time, my mom had a heart attack, so I called my dad but the call was not going through. Due to this, I messaged him on his phone but he did not check because he was busy in his meeting. Later when he checked my message on his phone, it was too late and I was already in the hospital with my mom. As you can see, not checking messages on time can put people into problems.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the phone is a great way of communicating than over the phone. This is because there can be some misunderstandings on text messages, which can only be solved by one call and many individuals do not check their phone promptly and often reply late that may cause trouble.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-03 | dnudlyjgtnudbphwev | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | dnudlyjgtnudbphwev | 70 | view |
| 2022-02-16 | kathia90 | 66 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | doggedarnab | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | edsonsimoes | 63 | view |
- TPO 28 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past 76
- TPO 25 Vessels used as electric batteries in the past 70
- Buzzing TPO 19 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society 70
- TPO 50 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, may, so, well, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52359550562 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76951500391 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492134831461 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9073468097 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2272727273 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294867030332 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854010821832 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071378395346 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187566265457 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06872769837 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.