Almost everyone agrees that communication is a great way to achieve a prosperous life. But should people contact each other via phone calls? Many people assume that we are conspicuously happier when we communicate with others by phone because it is easier and a time saver. However, it would be prudent to say that texting is the best way to engage with others. I feel this way for two reasons which I will examine in this essay.
First, it is important to consider that texting is a convenient way. Obviously, when we relate to others using texts, we are not using that much effort and preparation. In contrast, calling over the phone requires a lot of attention and care of the voice tone. As a result, if individuals use texts instead of calling, they would be more comfortable. For instance, during my studies at university, when I did not understand any assignment, I usually texted my friend and tried to solve our homework together. Moreover, we added other friends to a chat group, where we could chat together, and everyone put his concern and waited for an answer from other members. It was an effective way because we did not need to talk and waste our time through phone calls.
Besides the importance of being convenient, phone texts consider an effective manner as it is easier to communicate with people who live in other time zones. Evidently, organizations could benefit from this feature as members in different countries could text without any problem. Moreover, individuals also would contact each other when they live in different parts of the world. Thus people who live in many places would get along with each other via texting. This can be demonstrated by my personal example. When my sister traveled to continue her studies in the US, we tried to call her at different intervals. Since the time zone in the US is completely different from ours, she missed our calls and would not make contact with her. Therefore, texting was the perfect way to reach her. If we had not texted her, we would not have contacted her. Hence, texting is a great way for communicating with people inhabit different countries.
In conclusion, I believe that texting is the best way of communication. This opinion is because texting would save time and would be an effective way for people and organizations that have different members across the world.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages What type of communication do you prefer and why 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85432098765 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68252713623 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491358024691 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4632624016 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9166666667 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.79166666667 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220412707078 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727755896888 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725767282014 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150052562157 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654638724481 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.